<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earnest Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thephoenixagents.com/earnest-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thephoenixagents.com/earnest-money/</link>
	<description>Chris Butterworth - sharing thoughts on real estate (and everything else.)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 07:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Belt</title>
		<link>http://thephoenixagents.com/earnest-money/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northphoenixagent.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/real-estate-glossary-earnest-money/#comment-524</guid>
		<description>At a GRI class, I heard some interesting guidance from an instructor once.  He said he recommends to his clients to always put $500 or $1000 (I forget which).  And then, if the seller requests more earnest money in a counter, he re-counters agreeing to that increase in earnest money, so long as the seller matches it.

His thinking, why should the buyer be the only one with a ton of earnest money?  Make the seller put up earnest money for cases where the seller may breach as well.

I&#039;m not recommending this in any way...but I thought it was an interesting perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a GRI class, I heard some interesting guidance from an instructor once.  He said he recommends to his clients to always put $500 or $1000 (I forget which).  And then, if the seller requests more earnest money in a counter, he re-counters agreeing to that increase in earnest money, so long as the seller matches it.</p>
<p>His thinking, why should the buyer be the only one with a ton of earnest money?  Make the seller put up earnest money for cases where the seller may breach as well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not recommending this in any way&#8230;but I thought it was an interesting perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

