More REO Fun

by Heather on July 18, 2009

in Foreclosures / Short Sales

Dealing with REO purchases is just. So. Much. Fun!

Two weeks ago my buyer clients and I received a bank’s verbal acceptance of our offer on their house for sale.  The parties verbally agreed to close August 3.

Last week the bank sends back signed docs. Closing date is now August 18. First we heard of it!

Note to asset managers everywhere: A real estate contract is a bilateral document. One party can’t change the terms of the deal without the other party’s written consent.

Apparently banks now have the power to change contract law whenever they feel like it. Wow, that Obama administration really is bringing change. Change I can believe in? Not sure I want to.

note: I’m just being snarky. Obviously I don’t believe Obama’s team has anything to do with the fact that the banks practice the New Golden Rule:  “He who has the gold makes the rules.”

further note: Giving credit where it’s due, the bank’s asset manager was trying to do the buyers a favor. She took a week to get signatures back to us, so she thought she’d compensate by kindly giving the buyers more time to get their loan processed & closed. That’s nice. But the buyers don’t want a longer close. They want to close yesterday. It seems to me that the banks should require their asset managers to at least take a Contracts 101 seminar. A day of legalese for mid-level managers negotiating millions of dollars worth of bank assets. Really, is that too much to ask?


heather

Heather Barr is a Realtor. She's a chow hound, a gym rat, and the only political junkie in the USA who can actually keep her political views to herself. Instead, she focuses on educating her clients about the often-confusing world of residential real estate.

{ 2 trackbacks }

Are REO Deals Breaking Contract Law?
July 24, 2009 at 4:16 pm
Lenders, are they becoming greedy now that the market has turned: MY ANSWER YES | Napa Valley Address
November 18, 2009 at 8:53 am

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Heather July 19, 2009 at 8:39 pm

Hi John,

Thanks for visiting and reading, although I do wish you had read more carefully. I thought I made it obvious that the Obama comment was just an attempt at humor. Apparently, it wasn’t a successful attempt.

In any case, my point was exactly the same as yours: verbal agreements are a BAD idea and are also (nearly always) unenforceable.

Reply

john July 19, 2009 at 12:34 pm

So some clerk in the bank made a verbal agreement on a closing date? Excuse me, in California a verbal agreement in real estate carries no weight. Why blame Obama for ignorance? Seems like the right wing blames their live problems on anyone but themselves.

The Statue of Fraud in California states all real estate transactions must be in writing. Maybe you sell real estate on verbal terms. That’s worth the paper its written on and a great way to employ attorneys.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Read this blog's Comment Policy